Monday, May 14, 2007

Zoosequence, the Tree of Life A Saul Vogel Mystery













Picture by Alicja Fenigsen, see my links

Peter Billig

MR. VOGEL & HIS ANIMALS
A Saul Vogel mystery

Vogel was reading his paper in the sitting- room. Suddenly, he emitted an exclamation of surprise:
"How can it be!? Or am I nuts?…” He turned to me: “I need to talk about animals."
I put whatever I was holding back on the table and took the armchair opposite his.
"Tell me whether my reasoning is correct," he continued. "If all the herbivores of the savannas – the antelopes, zebras, giraffes and so on – died out, the carnivores out there – the lions, hyenas, cheetahs and so on – would follow?"
"Inexorably. There is a nutritional connection between these groups."
“But would it affect the carnivores of North America – wolves, coyotes and pumas?”
“No way! There is no dietary or even physical connection between those groups.”
"A hypothetical demise of all tapirs would have no impact on the well-being of echidnas?"
"Correct again. No connection at all, they live on separate continents."
"Then how do you explain this?"
He showed me two articles:
DEMISE OF A SPECIES was about a genus of rodents to be found only on one tiny island off California shore. The animals perished because the owner developed it. The last pair has been moved to a zoo, but both died there without offspring on 15 August 2006, killed by a stray cat.
DEMISE OF YET ANOTHER SPECIES was about a genus of bats found only in a few caves in South Africa. They have been under scientific supervision and their numbers were mounting. Last seen alive on 15 August 2006, they were seemingly doing well. Next day the researchers found them dead: not a single specimen survived. A very scrupulous postmortem unearthed no cause of death. It was as if all the bats simultaneously got fed up with life and died.
"How did the demise of the herbivorous rodents in California influence the dire fate of the insectivorous bats down in South Africa?" Vogel asked.
"It didn't. It was a coincidence in time. Each day a species or two of animals die out in our modern world! Every child knows that. We are vandals."
"It wasn't us who did these bats in, though. There is more to it than meets the eye."
"A natural cause the scientists didn’t think of and, consequently, didn’t test for, perhaps?"
"Not all natural laws are known," he replied thoughtfully, "and I propose to discover this one."
"Good luck!" but I did not expect him to succeed. How does one go about finding a new law of Nature?

Vogel seemed to know how. He asked Voss to drive over for a consultation. Voss is a bright engineer specializing in electronics. They met during Voss's hobo period and stayed friends since. Voss loves Vogel's ideas and is eager to give him the technical assistance to make them work.
He arrived at Domicile, our house in a big forest owned by Vogel. It was spring and they went for a walk into the green freshness of the new leaves and the sweet chirpings of multifarious birds.
When they came back, Vogel's Porsche got evicted from the garage and Voss's van, full of parts and tools, moved in, a workshop on wheels. As the workaholic was toiling there, I brought him lunch daily, but "bio-recorder/ player" was all he would say about the contraption he was making. Portable, it looked like a cross between a laptop and a tape-recorder, with a smart dish-shaped foldable antenna.
Then it was ready, Vogel told me to hold the fort, put the machine in his car and was gone.

During his absence, Vogel kept sending me two postcards apiece from zoos the world over. The first would say: Greetings from [so and so zoo], making progress. The second: Ditto. Each was a photo of an animal, bought in the "zoovenir" shop, but the animals were oddly paired. From the Beijing Zoo he sent a panda on the first card and some kind of pig on the other, from the Nairobi Zoo – an aardvark and a penguin.
I received over a hundred of such pairs. Obviously, they were meant as clues to Vogel’s work. I could see no logic in the choice of the species, though, and did not care much, having sufficiently to do with my own projects. I contented myself with tracking his chaotic movements on a globe.

Finally, eight months after he left, he phoned from Brazil about workers to arrive at my end the next day. They did, built a hothouse and instructed me how to operate the heating system: it was winter outside and the temperature inside was to be kept at 30°C (100°F). Florists' vans brought tropical plants. They were put inside the glasshouse and I was instructed how to care for them. A landscaper arrived with rocks and soil and used the plants to create a mini-jungle. Vogel arrived and a cage was brought in the greenhouse and he took me inside: hummingbirds were hovering and sucking nourishment at feeding stations. They were beautiful: green bodies with red wings and yellow heads, all with metallic-like shine.
"It's a shame to jail them,” I said enchanted with their humming and breathtaking beauty.
"I don't want to jail them, I have to."
He instructed me how to prepare their liquid food and went to sleep off his jetlag.

Next morning I awoke with a shout, sprang out of bed and felt so much energy, so much life in me that I had to do something extreme – or I would burst! In my pajamas, I jumped through the window shattering the pane and landing in a snow-drive outside. I got up and, howling like a wolf, I ran into the woods. I ran and ran in deep snow – there was no limit to my energy; I felt I could accomplish any physical feat. I scared some deer, caught up with them, overtook them and turning my head back I stuck my tongue out to them! Flabbergasted, the kindly animals stopped in their tracks and so did I – because I collided with a tree.
Concussed and laying in the snow I saw before me a mini player: open, the cassette beside. There was adhesive tape with strands of my hair glued to the contrivance. Clearly, the tape had been used to fasten it to my head while I was asleep. The player must have caused my hyperactive behavior. Now the device was torn off by the impact and nonfunctional. I felt boundlessly nonfunctional, too – and went out.















Picture by Alicja Fenigsen, see my links


As I regained consciousness, I was lying on our toboggan, wrapped in blankets and tugged by our snowmobile. Vogel must have tracked me. I was aching all over but not enough to keep me awake.
When I awoke I was in my own bed and it was noon of the next day. There was plastic sheeting on the damaged window: it had happened, then. In my head, I reviewed the “reel” of the events of the day before and I understood: it was Vogel who had affixed the player in order to make me an unwitting part – a guinea pig, a lab-rat – to a dangerous experiment. I could have been killed! Damn him!
I felt an urge to punch him, but I only stood up with effort, every fiber in my body aching as after an enormous physical exertion. No punching was possible. Slowly, I put on my dressing gown and wobbled to the sitting-room; I could hear him there busying himself with crockery and cutlery.
Words like "two-faced bastard" were on my lips, as I hobbled in, but seeing guilt on his face and my favorite foods on the table I ended up calling him a "serious asshole".
"That I am," he said, "but you are in need of serious nourishment."
That I was. The gourmet food Vogel is so good at was delicious. When we finished I was sufficiently restored to content myself with a demand for an explanation.
“Recall the dead rodents and bats?” he obliged. “My first thought was that the rodents kept the bats alive by their sheer existence: when they died, the bats died. But how exactly do they do that?"
"Sending postcards, one species to another?"
"Bio-waves," he smiled, "capable of reaching far-off continents and non-disturbing for transmissions like radio, TV and radar; otherwise they would have been discovered long ago. I discussed the matter with Voss and, being a genius, he constructed a device capable of recording and playing back such hypothetical waves. I visited zoos innumerable to record waves emitted by one species and playing them while I walked about looking for a change of behavior in other species. Animals on my postcards are the emitters and the receivers, the former enabling the latter to live. I discovered such pairs in every zoo and was soon running out of rare species. Zoos repeat themselves: there is always a complete set of PR-beasts like the elephant, the hippo, the bear or the chimp. I was forced to do much of my research in Nature, bitten and sucked by mosquitoes, freezing, thirsting, drenched to the skin or hanging off a mountain!” He looked me in the eyes.

I’ve been living a quiet life while he’s been taking mortal risks – and he exposed me to only a minor one.
“You are pardoned,” I said and he poured me a large malt from his very private and expensive hoard.
I drank up with gusto. He poured another for us both and went on:
“There is a difference between the waves emitted by animals and those played by the machine. The first are long-range and sustain normal level of activity in the receiver-species, the second are short-range and cause hyperactivity, easy to detect. In this simple manner I was able to discern what species guarantees life to which, this in turn assuring life to yet another. It must have been like that all through the Evolution: some species simply couldn't pop up until an entirely different species evolved into a new species and produced a new pattern of waves enabling it to appear, perhaps on another continent."
He raised his glass: "I drink to the Zoosequence, my newly discovered Law of Nature!"
I drank up but stayed skeptical: "A sequence of millions of species: one at the bottom, guaranteeing life to the next and so on, all the way to the top: one long chain. If you destroy the species at the root, you’ve killed them all. If you exterminate a species in the upper parts of the chain, you take life of all those above. And were it a ring, animal life would be dead long ago, with dinosaurs, mammoths, dodos gone and now a species or two exterminated each and every day..."
"Not a ring – a tree, observably! The Tree of Life! There is the Trunk, a short affair consisting of some 10 000 species and having the qualities you mentioned, and there are Branches, as most of those in the Trunk assure existence of more than one species. These secure life for short side sequences of species, as was the case with the rodents guaranteeing the bats guaranteeing, say, a species of beetles in French Guyana, which nobody is missing, as it has not been discovered yet? And this Branch ends there. So far, we have been lucky that all of the lost species were in the Branches, not in the Trunk. Thanks to your participation, my guess has been validated: it is the hummingbirds who are our emitters. Sorry I used you, but I was afraid to awake the Hulk in some strangers.”

He poured another for us and suddenly I understood:
"More afraid of what kind of a Hulk would be aroused in yourself – as you would have to be close at hand. This is why you used me!" I said accusingly.
"Guilty as charged but, as I was the one with the knowledge, I had to remain outside. The attachable very short-range player was made by Voss on my request. I phoned him from Brazil."

Suddenly, I am aware that my employer is looking at me in a queer way, so I asked for a mirror. As I was viewing the maltreated face of but a casual resemblance to me, Vogel sighed and gave me a sizable raise.
“Now that we have their emissions recorded,” I said feeling elated by this token of appreciation, “we don’t need the birds. It’s only a technical problem to get the right quality of the waves and then we could use the satellite net to beam them to all over the world and even take them on Mars…”
“I like your modern global approach but I still prefer the genuine article.”
“You had the recording, so you didn’t need to bring the hummingbirds to have your experiment. Why all these costs to make an artificial jungle? Weren’t they happy in their natural environment?”
"Brazilians are about to make timber out of their habitat in the Amazonas," he replied. “And what if the technicians can’t get the waves right? Can mankind survive if we all become Tarzans, like you had?”

I pondered these – and other – questions for some time.
"And what’s the species at the root of the Trunk, ensuring all animal and human life?" I asked finally.
"I haven't found out yet."
"But, at any rate, we are at the top of the Trunk, aren't we?"
"Human vanity! We are high up the Trunk, I’ll give you that. We occupy the level just before the very top, and the top is split into two Branches. Thus, we have the honor and the privilege of guaranteeing the existence of the two topmost species in Nature."
"Which are …?" I held my breath.
"The house-fly (Musca domestica) and the skunk (Mephitis mephitis)." Vogel raised his glass: "To Mankind: let’s keep on accomplishing that historic mission of ours!"

Copyright Peter Billig 2007
















Picture by Alicja Fenigsen, see my links

Friday, May 11, 2007

THE SIDE EFFECT

Peter Billig

THE SIDE EFFECT

Unlike other creeds, we Plaudists have not been persecuted: people never took us seriously and we, for our part, have not been making a nuisance of ourselves: our only public appearances – the attempts of setting off and protracting applause whenever and wherever the opportunity offers – are – anyone would concede – of an innocuous character; they even earn us some goodwill, mainly in Thespian circles.

As the public know only that our entire rite consists of clapping hands, and we, for our part, pursue no information or missionary activities (new coreligionists are enrolled only if vouched for by three sponsoring members), there is a proliferation of contrary opinions: that it is applause for the perfection of the Creator and His Creation; that we do it in order to attract His attention; that the cadenced salvos of handclapping imbue us with a feeling of safety and power.
The truth is, however, that belief or unbelief in God is a private matter of each of us.
By what right, then, do we profess ourselves as a faith?
Because in the period when Plaudism was established it was safer to be deemed a heretic than an atheist.
Who do we clap for, then?
For nobody. We clap in order to achieve the Side Effect.
What Side Effect?
To explain, we must go back to the very genesis of the movement.

Count Wolfgang von Bodenheim, a welcome guest at Maria Theresia’s court, as he was promenading, on August the 12th 1770, in a Viennese park, picked up and returned a batiste handkerchief to a pretty young lady who had dropped it. She thanked him, but the accompanying cavalier slapped his face.
The gallant Count went home ruminating upon the unpredictability of human reactions. Having eaten a meal and spoken to a friend, whom he burdened with a matter of greatest urgency, he returned to his meditations, supporting his thoughts with laconic notes.
The fruit of these musings was the unexpected conclusion – the cornerstone of Plaudism to this day – that to every action, resulting every time in the same proven and evident outcome, corresponds, at some umpteenth, albeit unforeseeable, repetition, a specific side effect. Thus, handing over lost handkerchiefs to ladies invariably causes their gratitude; only at some instance, which is fixed in advance, though unknown to us, it causes a slap on the face from an escorting cavalier.
Against all appearances, this theory contains nothing mystical: if because of God’s will or, say, the laws of Nature a splash is heard whenever a stone is thrown into water, why should it be strange if, on the strength of some divine or natural law, an umpteenth splash be linked with, say, development of spots on the Sun?

But why did the prosaic and unadventurously thinking Count thrust himself upon this highly speculative theory, savoring of a bad joke, without any comparative material except the episode of the handkerchief?
Because it dawned on him that although shortly before he had celebrated his 31st birthday, he achieved nothing worthy of remembrance by the future generations and that he had only a fifty-fifty chance – considering the gravity of his present situation – of achieving anything like that in the future. And that is why, ignoring the scarcity of material, he went on with his undertaking, now and then getting (as his chaotic notes testify) off the road, chasing his tail or falling asleep.

Illumination reached him in the early hours; the manuscript does not state whether he was asleep or alert at that time. It states, however, in a categorical form – as if it were a fact unconditionally true and proven – that there are merely three things one can do to bring about side effects salutary for Mankind: clapping hands, smacking lips and snapping fingers: clapping – the greatest, smacking – a lesser one, snapping – the least.
What effects exactly? There is no doubt that he knew, but he’s never written it down, as he was interrupted by the arrival of his second with a box of pistols. An hour later he fell with a bullet in his heart.

Count Hubert von Bodenheim, while sorting out the papers of his deceased brother, had the spiritual upheaval of his life. Having recognized the notes as the late brother’s last will and testament, he presented them for the company of mutual friends and acquaintances where they were received as a revelation.
And that’s how Plaudism came into being: initially, it bore the hallmark of an elite aristocratic club; later, its roster and numbers were decided by the resultant of the spirit of the following epochs. At present, there are 537 of us from every nation and walk of life.

As years passed, divergences within our community became visible: some members would maintain that the illumination of Count Wolfgang had been the result of divine intervention; others – that it had been a tangle of natural causes; some – that we owe it to the Count alone. These we call “humanists”, those we call “naturalists”, and the first – “theists”, but it is a delimitation purely formal, of no practical value.
A more important issue is that we differ as to what exactly would be most salutary for Mankind. Here the views span, to cite the most uncompromising, from “immediate and painless extinction of our species” through “unbridled sexual license” to “immortality”.
The most important issue is that – because of one of the Count’s blurred turns of phrase – some of us tend to avow that the most salutary side effect can be attained only after achieving the two smaller ones; and since others (the so-called “medialists” or, in common parlance: “smackers”) persist that the least salutary has already been achieved as the illumination of the Count (tradition confirms that he was habitually snapping his fingers whenever upset), and yet others (the so-called “minimalists”, conversationally: “snappers”) uphold that even the least salutary has not been achieved, the first concentrate on smacking their lips, the latter – on snapping their fingers – and both groups clap only in congregation – with no conviction or enthusiasm – only to maintain
esprit de corps, while the overwhelming majority (the so-called “maximalists”, colloquially “claquers”) profess the healthy tenet that there is no point in pursuing petty aims – and they go directly for the ultimate prize. However, duly appreciating the minimalists’ and the medialists’ good will, we maximalists have introduced the custom of devoting a substantial portion of our general assemblies to joint snapping and smacking: we do not lack tolerance!

Some outsiders with an above average insight into our affairs spurn us that we profess such an unstable doctrine: without any assurance the it all is not a hoax by Count Wolfgang.
Well, we have testimony of reliable witnesses to the effect that the Count has been utterly devoid of any sense of humor, but we got to hand it to the critics that in order to become a Plaudist you really have to possess a great dose of optimism. Moreover, we are people so highly cultured, educated and open-minded that wobbly articulations of a pesky count have no credence among us.

Why then do we fritter away our precious years and energy?
Well… in case he was right. For how many millennia have you been offering up prayers, exploring Nature, building industries, changing political systems – and to what avail?
And we?
Well, we might insinuate ourselves into something by snapping, smacking or clapping.
And if not – who’s worse off?

Vos plaudite![1]

Copyright © Peter Billig 2007


[1] You applaud! That’s how the Roman playwright, Plautus, speaks from the scene to his audience at the end of every of his comedies.

Thursday, May 03, 2007

THE HUB OF THE UNIVERSE A Saul Vogel Mystery

Peter Billig

THE HUB OF THE UNIVERSE

A Saul Vogel Mystery

“Should I give you this red herring not even knowing whether you really exist?” Master protested.

It was late evening. We had had supper, but we stayed at the table in order to gratify his gastronomic endeavors. His refusal to share was dictated by the sad reality that out of a dozen of the tasty fish only one was left. Moreover, today of all days, he had taken stock of all his philosophical achievements and was therefore in indecently high spirits – which always makes him poke fun at me.
“You don’t know if I exist? I’ve been your assistant from time immemorial!”
“It’s not so obvious,” he replied. “The only unquestionable thing is that it is I, Saul Vogel, who exist. How can I know whether you and everybody and everything else are not figments of my own imagination? That you are not phantoms, delusions, allurements – entities fictitious, abstract, false and mendacious? How can I be sure that while talking to you I am not addressing my own specters – hallucinations and phantasms dwelling not outside but solely and exclusively within myself? Can you prove your existence?”
Cogito ergo sum!” I said proudly.
“Yes, yes,” Master was positively mirthful. “The old mantra by Helvetius, which does not prove anything but the existence of thought – my thought, that is. Helvetius himself is also a fabrication of my own mind.”
“It was not Helvetius, but Cartesius, a.k.a. Descartes.” It was my turn to be mirthful. “And why should I be an invention of your imagination and not the other way round? What, pray, makes you more significant than me? Don’t we both urinate, defecate, ruminate and copulate?”
“You?” he giggled contemptuously. “There is no such thing as a ‘thou’, a ‘he’, a ‘she’, an ‘it’, a ‘we’, a ‘ye’ or a ‘they’! There is only an ‘I’: there exists just ME, Saul Vogel, ME/I, the first and only person singular!”
“In that case,” I chuckled contemptuously, “the only option left is to punch your smug face: you will acknowledge that also EYE do exist!”
“Not in the least!” he retorted. “I shall only acknowledge the existence of my own pain. What are your feelings, your thoughts, your sufferings, moans and perplexities as you yourselves are but empty deceptions and mirages inside my brain, products of my uncontrolled and involuntary fantasy: phantasmagorias! Fata Morganas! I don’t sense with your skins when you burn yourselves nor with your stomachs when you starve nor with your heads when you think. And that’s why you’ll never be able to prove that you are a being material and independent, as whatever you do, whatever you say, in whatever manner you behave, I would still have to put you down as yet another intellectual manifestation of myself.”
“No way!” I retorted. “That’s exactly why you should recognize us as materially in existence: since one cannot feel with the matter of a stranger, you would have – should you be the only one in existence – the closest of contacts with your own illusions: they would be an integral part of you!”
“On the contrary,” he was adamant. “Do I feel the pain of the personages appearing and disappearing in one’s dreams? Never, unless I have a stomachache!”
“Not so long ago you took a tumble down the stairs and broke your leg,” I was adamant. “You could at least concede that the stairs were real.”
“No way!” he was being stubborn. “That is also a fruit of my fruitful brains. The only thing I know about the leg and the stairs has reached me through the so-called ‘senses’, which is exactly the same way as you and other fictions of your brand show themselves. But it has been stated: you are ghosts, ergo neither my leg nor those stairs exist!”
“You are not trying to tell me,” I was being stubborn, “that neither you exist? You are not going to be so brazen as to assert that also your bodily encasement is a creation of your intellect?! That you are an intellect alone: a mind liberated from the shackles of the body!”
“I am!” Master bellowed. “I’m the Hub of the Universe: the Omphalos! the Logos! the Universal Being! the Ouroboros! the Mother and the Father of Totality! I’m the Absolute! I’m the Pure Self! I’m Demiurges and Gaia! I’m the Mind Liberated! I’m the Place To Stand On! I’m Alpha and Omega!”
“Liar!” I bellowed in turn. “I am Noûs, the Axis of Everything, the Center of the World and the Mother of All! I am the Deity and the Cosmos! I am the Essence and the Quintessence! I am the Beginning, the Middle and the End! I am the Ball and the Goal and the Game! I am Uranus, Cronos and Zeus! I am Aleph and Beit! Gimel and Dalet! And you, Master, are Zayin!”

“Shut up your face!” Master thundered[1]. “How dare you?!”
“How come?” I laughed into his face. “Have you descended from your pedestal to talk to me – your own delirium tremens? You – the Apeiron? You – the Arche? You – the Spiritus Movens?!
There was a moment of silence while Vogel’s face became purple and from purple – dark blue. I must have overdone it, so I hurried to smooth it out and said amicably:
“Why don’t you exert your will and try whether you can, by its power, destroy the phantasms and the banshees of your mind, such as me? This way you could stake your claim empirically!”
He nodded, closed his eyes, and his face began slowly to display the signs of utmost concentration.
The clock on the mantelpiece began to chime midnight.

When I regained consciousness, my head was resting upon Master’s knees who was trying to pour some whisky between my clenched jaws. As the Scottish ambrosia was exactly what I needed at the moment, I made it easy for him – and bliss began to spread all over my Being.
“Get up, you cheat!” Master roared discovering the fraud.
I got up and looked at the clock: ten minutes past midnight.
“Whassa matta, Bwana?” I asked seeing his sorry face. “Why are you so sullen? Haven’t you nearly taken my measly life? Haven’t you established that you are what you claimed to be?”
“Yes, I have,” he replied dismally, “only that when my will was cutting your illusory body and fictitious soul like a hot knife cuts through cold butter, suddenly, it began to cut in vacuum.”
“I don’t get it, Master.”
“Is it so hard to figure out? I was the Mind Liberated only for one day – steering the world at will and whim – and exactly at twelve o’clock the honor was transferred – by some mysterious design – to someone else! I had some very deep and disturbing – ominous! – dreams last night, but as soon as I woke up it was to pee, to shit, to have breakfast and so on – the daily treadmill! First in the evening, after I had made the list of my accomplishments, the realization of my power got through – in a childish manner: playing games with you! Just imagine, what I could have brought about if I were fully cognizant of the situation from the moment I woke up. In these eighteen hours I could have changed the course of the world, repaired the hothouse effect, replenished the jungles and the seas, removed wrongdoers, redressed conflicts, stopped misuse of children, women, men…”

“No use crying over spilt milk, Master!” I cut him short. “Judging by results, the only really terrific Mind Liberated was the one of January 17, 1966, when the woman of my dreams allowed me to make love…”
“Don’t you understand?!” he cut me short. “The transfer of the Power means that from midnight also I – ME, SAUL VOGEL! – became – again! – a manifestation of some stranger’s – an asshole’s! – mind!”
“Well, Master, judging by you, me and the state of the world the Minds Liberated chosen nowadays are not that bad.” Actually, I was grateful to the new Mind for upholding me. “During the World Wars: these were really assholes! And perhaps the power will return to you one day and you will recognize it at once, wake up, perform – and planet Earth will become Paradise! No more Ahmadinejads, Mugabes or Bashirs!” I tried to comfort him, but he shook his head, got up and shuffled dejectedly upstairs to his bedroom.

Copyright © Peter Billig 2007.



[1] Zayin, the name of a Hebrew letter, is also the Hebrew name for “dick”, “prick”, “cock”, “pecker” or whatever you prefer calling the useful organ.